Excerpt: Getting to Know the Other Side |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
For the leader of a superpower, summitry means briefly meeting his counterpart, surrounded by a circus of foreign policy aides, security agents, and reporters, amidst widespread hope that somehow the discussions will make war less likely. Four out of ten Americans confess to expecting a major world war within the next decade. It’s no wonder many people dream of a breakthrough during a fireside conversation, a walk in the woods, or a quiet dinner in an embassy. Sometimes leaders sign a meaningful agreement at the summit, yet the "spirit" of the occasion always seems to dissipate not long after the leaders fly home. In general, summitry simply means going to the top. We ordinarily think of the top as being occupied by officeholders rather than by citizens. Since war is conducted by nations, it’s assumed that peace is likewise necessarily created "at the highest levels." All that citizens can do, according to this theory, is vote for the best available leaders and then acquiesce in what they do, unless their actions become flagrantly counterproductive. A different perspective was offered, in striking terms, by Dwight D. Eisenhower, who had commanded a great army and who, when he spoke, was President of the U.S. "I like to believe," he said in 1959, "that people in the long run are going to do more to promote peace than are governments." He may have liked to believe this because he knew from direct experience how awful wars arehow awful they were even prior to the nuclear ageand also how awkward governments have generally been in preventing them. EXCERPTS FROM SOME REVIEWS Willis Harman, President, the Institute of Noetic Sciences: William E. Colby, former U.S. Director of Central Intelligence: Amory Lovins, Director of Research, Rocky Mountain Institute:
|
||||
| Excerpts used on this site by permission of the author. | |||||